Monday, November 27, 2017

BABY DRIVER






BABY DRIVER: C
Interesting characters brought to life through strong performances by talented actors in a rather weak script, full of contradictions.
I found the main character of Miles "Baby" played by Ansel Elgort to be a gripping study full of a decent mixture of exposition, present dilemma and the uncertainty of future. We all operate based on past events, present situations and the fear/hope of tomorrow. I appreciate the reflection of this particular slice of life that "Baby" gave.
Although underutilized I found the role of Bats, to be one of the best that I've seen Jamie Foxx ever play in. Sometimes actors have  niches. After watching this I think Foxx may have found his.
I'll be politically incorrect for a moment as well as historically significant in the same breath. Kevin Spacey gave a strong performance as well. Ironic that what is likely to be his last role in a major motion picture, he plays a slime ball that he'll most likely be remembered for.
Enough with the praise. Now for the criticism.
It felt to me like part of the script was revised with rewrites, but they forgot to go back and revise other parts of the script to make the choices that characters make, make sense.
"Baby" is concerned for the health and welfare of his beloved girlfriend Debora, and puts her safety first, only to later put her in jeopardizing situations.
Doc menacingly threatens his life, and the life of Debora if he refuses to do the job. We're given information within the dialog that knocking off "Baby" or harming/killing the most important person in his life would be no big deal to him. Yet less than an hour later, "Baby" purposefully causes the job to fail, costing Doc what could have been millions of dollars, killing two of his best employees and we're supposed to buy that Doc would give him a bag full of money, and sacrifice his own life protecting him?
The film ending as soon as it got interesting was also a huge problem in the script. As the stakes rose, it felt as if the film were going to go into an exciting game of cat and mouse between "Baby" and a vengeful "Buddy." Instead we're given a sped through final confrontation, highlighted only through special effects and a semi-cool death scene.
Lastly, it seemed as if the story broke the cardinal rule of having a main character go through significant changes. "Baby" was the same person at the end of the film that he was at the beginning. Yet the more I thought about it, I think the film's goal was to transform the opinions of its audience. To appeal to an audience that sat down with unshakable thoughts of how and why someone turns to criminal activity and stood up with a completely new perspective. Fine to make your point, but it seemed a tad subtle for as strong of a conviction as it seemed to be.
Substance sacrificed for style, in this mediocrity of action.

Saturday, November 4, 2017

WE ARE STILL HERE

WE ARE STILL HERE
WE ARE STILL HERE: B

Suspenseful, eerie, creepy and unsettling, if I dare say frightening. A story who made the most of simple scares, tension and the unknown. The cinematography, camera angles and overall choices concerning visuals and shots was quite impressive. Award winning impressive. It added to the overall uneasiness of the film's atmosphere.

My only criticism and it's not severe, was the film tried to hard to be two polar opposites at once. There are some ideas that are in absolute juxtaposition of one another. Ideas like two negative charges or two positive charges. When you try and put them together they repel off each other. I feel that happened in this film.

At points it seemed the film wanted to head into and leave its audience with an ambiguous ending. At other times it seemed the film wanted to be very open as to what was going on with a grand reveal. The audience was sort of left with both at the end and I feel that had a choice been made to go one way or the other, it would have made for a stronger ending.

Too much was revealed to satisfy an ambiguous hunger and not enough was revealed to satisfy the what happened and why it happened starvation. We were given samples of each, perhaps one more than the other.

The acting in this film was also good. No academies or Oscars will be sought after, but Monte Markham gave the best performance over all. Between his iconic voice and eccentric mannerisms, I felt a genuine fear of the man.

I've seen better horror films, but I've also seen a lot worse. Comparatively speaking to the horror genre as a whole, nothing too special. Comparing to horror films in the last 7 years, it is one of the better.


Wednesday, November 1, 2017

ANNABELLE CREATION

ANNABELLE CREATION 
ANNABELLE CREATION: C-

A series of irrational and illogical choices wrapped up in nonsensical transitions to conveniently move the plot forward, is the best way to describe this film.

Strong performances from the actors, with notable lighting and special effects kept this film watchable, but the outright stupid decisions made by characters throughout the film kept the film from being good.

Without giving away too much, I'll make a quick analogy to make my point. Imagine watching JAWS when the shark is swimming around killing people in the water. Someone screams how scared they are, and that they want to get away. So they take a knife, cut their leg, dive into the water and immediately get devoured by the shark. Yeah, choices made by the characters in this film made about as much sense as that.

I'll give the film that amongst a few jump scares it did have some genuinely freaky and even borderline scary moments. It's a shame a better story couldn't have been developed so that rather than sit through a film whose sole purpose it was to startle you often, scare you little, would have been more enjoyable.